Any suggestions on camera worth purchasing or ones to avoid?
Any suggestions on camera worth purchasing or ones to avoid?
I am thinking about getting a digital camera. How exactly do you get the pictures developed? Thanks!
------------------
Kim S.
*Scrap in a Snap*
Area Manager
www.scrapinasnapstuff.com
Iluvscrappin-- you can get your photos developed through several online developers. Shutterfly, Snapfish, Photoworks are a few I've used but I know there's others. You upload your images to their website and order your phots from them.
------------------
Brandy
As for film speed, I have been reading "Photography for Dummies" - one of those series of books I swore I'd never read, but a friend raved about this book and I checked it out from my library. It's all point and shoot and I have learned SO MUCH about my camera and love having it explained to me in a simplistic friendly way! Anyway, the author of this book recommends 400 speed for all purpose shooting and 800 speed for low lighting situations. He said that it used to be the case that higher speeds of film would get you grainier pictures, but not true anymore. In fact, he promises that your pictures will come out brighter, sharper, and clearer. Sometimes when you use lower speed films it causes unneccesary muddiness.
Amy
Minolta X300, SLR - I've had for years and still love it. This would be my camera of choice except it's hard to take along all the lenses and stuff that go with it. It's also not the type of camera I can hand to someone else and ask them to take a picture. It also provides me with the best pictures by far, but this is something you really need to take the time to learn to use.
Olympus Infinity Mini 35 mm - This one usually gets left in my car for those times when I have forgotten my carmera. It is also really small and will fit in a shirt pocket. Great for weddings and special events like that. Doesn't have a zoom, which is why I bought my third camera.
Kodak Advantix C700 - Aside from the cost of film development, I love this camera! It is probably the one I use the most now, because it's easy to use. I can drop a roll of film into it and hand it to anyone and they can usually figure out how to use it in about 5 minutes. It has zoom and red eye reduction which were two big features I was looking for. I also like that I don't have too shoot an entire roll before changing film. This is a real plus for me because I like to shoot color and black and white and this gives me opportunity to change mid roll. Then when I want to switch back, it just automatically re-loads the film to the proper place. You can also place a title on the back of your pictures as well as date and time. I've seen that the new Advantix now has the window like the digitals that displays your pictures before printing it to the actual film. I just maybe buying my 4th camera.
I haven't ventured into the world of digital yet, although I did help my sister test out a couple that she had from work and it was pretty cool!
I would suggest that you write down the features that are really important to you in a camera and take that list with you when you shop. It will make your shopping experience alot easier and you will walk away with all the features you wanted and probably be pretty happy. Also, most of the major manufactures have web-sites with information about their cameras. I know before I bought my Advantix, I went to the Kodak web-site and read the manual to make sure it was easy enough to use and it had all the features I was looking for. You may also want to look at warranty info and find out where you have to take it for repair and normal maintenance.
Good Luck on your search.
Baileys Mom - I only use Kodak film - mostly because half my family is employed there so I can't tell you which would be the best. I do know that you get better results if they use the same brand of paper when processing. In other words if you use Kodak film and it's processed on Kodak paper, you are likely to get better results. I use mostly 400 speed film when I'm taking pictures of my kids because they tend to move alot quicker and I get pretty good results. I don't notice them being any grainer than when I shoot 200 speed. Also, if you find your not getting good results, it may be a good time to try a different place for developing. Last year, I switched where I was having my film developed because I wasn't happy with my pictures. I thought it was my camera, when indeed it was the developing.
[This message has been edited by Patti H (edited 08-03-2001).]
[This message has been edited by Patti H (edited 08-03-2001).]